Are You Afraid Of Islam?, DV8’s Can We Talk About This?

This is Islam­o­pho­bic shit,” cried an angry spec­ta­tor two-thirds of the way through DV8’s inves­ti­ga­tion of mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism in ‘Can We Talk About This?’.

This’ being free speech, mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism, Islam, Islamism, the issues at the heart of DV8’s extra­or­di­nary new show.

Lloyd New­son’s com­pany has, for more than quar­ter of a cen­tury, blurred the lines between dance and the­atre as a way of, in the company’s own words, ‘rein­vest­ing dance with mean­ing, par­tic­u­larly where this has been lost through for­malised tech­niques’. It has always tack­led con­tro­ver­sial and dif­fi­cult sub­jects, but the lat­est is likely to be the most chal­leng­ing yet.

can-we-talk-about-this

The show opens, as most of those in the audi­ence must have known, with a cast mem­ber demand­ing of the spec­ta­tors ‘Do you feel morally supe­rior to the Tal­iban?’.  It’s a nod to Mar­tin Amis who asked that same ques­tion to a hos­tile audi­ence in a noto­ri­ous debate at London’s ICA, back in 2007. It is hardly the most sophis­ti­cated of ques­tions. Yet its very unso­phis­ti­ca­tion reveals so starkly the spec­tre haunt­ing the lib­eral moral swamp.

It is that sense of moral ret­i­cence – even of guilt – at the thought of pass­ing judg­ment upon other cul­tures, revealed by the reluc­tance to think that one could be morally supe­rior to the Tal­iban, that lies at the heart of Can We Talk about This?.  The show begins with the infa­mous Ray Hon­ey­ford row in Brad­ford in 1985, and moves through the Rushdie affair, the mur­der in 2004 of Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh, the Dan­ish car­toons con­tro­versy the fol­low­ing year, and the ban­ning in 2009 of Dutch MP Geert Wilders from this coun­try because of his anti-Islamic film Fitna, all inter­wo­ven with dis­cus­sions of forced mar­riage, hon­our killings, jihadism.  The emo­tion that courses through every scene is a pul­sat­ing anger at the way that lib­eral cow­ardice has inter­wo­ven with mul­ti­cul­tural naivety to allow Islamist extrem­ist to silence crit­ics and to betray both prin­ci­ples and people.

398008-kim-jomi-fischer-hannes-langolf

Newson’s argu­ment that there is a con­spir­acy of silence about Islamist wrongs is under­mined by the fact that most of the cases he doc­u­ments are already famil­iar to us from the media. “To speak out,” some­one says, “is called racist.” No, it’s not: it’s called jour­nal­ism, as evi­denced by the quotes in the show from Mar­tin Amis and Christo­pher Hitchens, and the numer­ous colum­nists cited in the pro­gramme. And, much as I applaud a piece of phys­i­cal the­atre that deals with seri­ous issues, the debate about mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism is over-simplified. What is never explored is the idea that inte­gra­tion in some areas of life can be com­bined with preser­va­tion of one’s cul­tural and reli­gious iden­tity. Per­haps such crit­i­cism is unfair. After all, Can We Talk About This? is phys­i­cal the­atre not a round­table dis­cus­sion. The ambi­tion of the show, and its will­ing­ness to stomp all over the debate, is its great strength.

Can We Talk About This?

As always with DV8, the phys­i­cal side of the show is impres­sive: one female per­former illus­trates the deter­mi­na­tion to escape a forced mar­riage purely through sin­u­ous hand and hip movements.

Can We Talk About This? is, like all DV8 works, both thought pro­vok­ing and gut-wrenching, food for mind and heart. It is the kind of bold, polem­i­cal spec­ta­cle that the the­atre so badly needs, a world away from the insipid offer­ings that all too often lit­ter the con­tem­po­rary stage.


The Bible Sticker

bible

Based on stick­ers that were offi­cially placed inside high school biol­ogy text­books in the U.S.A which warned read­ers: “Evo­lu­tion is a the­ory, not a fact, regard­ing the ori­gin of liv­ing things. It should be read with an open mind and crit­i­cally con­sid­ered.” The Bible Sticker, cre­ated by Packard Jen­nings, is given away for free with the instruc­tions: “Keep this sticker in your wal­let. When you stay in a motel, adhere your sticker to the inside jacket of the Bible.

Down­load a sheet of Bible Stick­ers to print at home by click­ing in the image below! 

Give them to peo­ple with instruc­tions. Keep them in your wal­let and stick them to the inside jacket of a Bible when you stay in a motel.


Tonight: Controversial ‘Golgota Picnic’ in Berlin

The most con­tro­ver­sial the­ater piece of last year, “Gol­gota Pic­nic” will be shown in Berlin as part of the For­eign Affairs Fes­ti­val.

Paris’s most pres­ti­gious the­atre was being pro­tected by riot police and guard-dog patrols on Thurs­day after it became the lat­est tar­get in a wave of Catholic protests across France against so-called “blas­phe­mous” play.

Two men reported to have links to fun­da­men­tal­ist Catholic groups were arrested at the week­end while attempt­ing to dis­able the theatre’s secu­rity system.

The­atre­go­ers have been advised to arrive an hour early to get through the airport-style secu­rity before reach­ing their seats.

Jean-Michel Ribes, head of the Théâtre de Rond-Point, appealed for calm. He said: “The Théâtre du Rond-Point isn’t an anti-Christian, anti-Muslim or anti-Jewish place.” But he said the role of artists was to fight against “suf­fo­cat­ing dogma”.

That was the reac­tion when the play was shown in Paris last year.

In Gól­gota Pic­nic, Argen­tin­ian direc­tor Rodrigo Gar­cía makes a furi­ous indict­ment of west­ern soci­ety. He aims at muse­ums as modern-day tem­ples in which Chris­t­ian iconog­ra­phy rep­re­sent­ing tor­ture – crowns of thorns, cas­ti­ga­tion and cru­ci­fix­ion – is pre­sented even to chil­dren. Blood and beauty go together, for exam­ple in pas­sages of Bach’s St. Matthew Pas­sion, which tells of suf­fer­ing and death while meat is churned through a min­cer on the big screen and worms crawl bury into ground flesh. Gar­cía presents a macabre pic­nic, using con­sumerism as a stage, and pro­vokes a seri­ous, con­tro­ver­sial debate on Christ’s promise of heal­ing that founders due to human self-empowerment. Finally, there is extreme chaos, made up of silence, iso­la­tion, and decel­er­a­tion – beauty that has to be endured. And with­out redemption.

The play will be in Span­ish with Ger­man sub­ti­tles and will be fol­lowed by an artist talk.


The Monsters of Fascism: Two Minutes of Spain’s Darkest Moments

For the Title Sequence of the film ‘Bal­ada Triste de Trompeta’ (Álex de la Igle­sia, 2010),  David L. Guaita cre­ates a work with images asso­ci­ated with Spain under Franco.

The Val­ley of the Fallen, cler­i­cal fas­cism, the meet­ing with Hitler at Hen­daye, the Falange Party, mixed up with Universal’s Clas­sic Mon­sters and the score by Roque Baños as background.

The dark­est moments of Spain’s mod­ern history.


Miss Kitty & The Controversial Sculptures of Paolo Schmidlin

Orga­niz­ers of an exhi­bi­tion in Milan, Italy drew harsh protest from the Catholic Anti-Defamation League and oth­ers who found the sculp­ture of the Pope Bene­dict in drag to be unac­cept­able.  The theme of exhi­bi­tion was the rela­tion­ship between homo­sex­u­al­ity and art. How­ever, the cen­sor­ship of the piece has also caused a stir.

The sculp­ture, titled “Miss Kitty” by Paolo Schmidlin, por­trays the Pope wear­ing noth­ing but gor­geous thigh-high stock­ings, a pair of panties and a stole. The sculp­ture, which is adorned with a blonde bob wig, offended the Catholic Anti-Defamation League, which threat­ened to seek charges against the orga­niz­ers and exhibit pro­mot­ers for defam­ing a head of state. Oth­ers have stated the cen­sor­ship of the sculp­ture is another exam­ple of “Orga­nized reli­gion dic­tat­ing the role of art.” and that “This type of cen­sor­ship should not be happening !”

This is “Porno Queen”, a sculp­ture of Her Majesty, Queen Eliz­a­beth II. The sculp­ture was shown in Madrid, Spain, in 2007, in a show that was (hilar­i­ously) opened by their own rein­ing monarch, King Juan Car­los. Royal experts reacted with fury yes­ter­day when a vile sculp­ture of a hand grop­ing The Queen’s Breast went on display.

The Sun’s royal pho­tog­ra­pher Arthur Edwards said: “This is quite obvi­ously the work of a lunatic. I don’t see this as any­thing more than a cheap stunt.”

And royal author Judy Wade said: “I was appalled when I saw this. I think it is dis­gust­ing. ”Spain’s King Juan Car­los did not seem to have a prob­lem with it — he opened the show.

Whether one finds the work of Paolo Schmidlin to be a cheap stunt or not, is impor­tant to remem­ber that “One of the many val­ues of art from the period of the avant-garde onwards has been to free one­self from the dog­matic and eccle­si­as­tic cen­sors.” What the fuck is a ‘Royal Expert’ anyway?


Teen Masturbates In Church Because He “Was Bored”

Today I came across the fol­low­ing “news” report from Niceville, Florida. Yes, I’m not mak­ing it up… Niceville. Accord­ing to Betty Dod­son from ‘Sticky — a doc­u­men­tary on masturbation’ “Masturbating to Orgasm may be the most polit­i­cal act that we can do”. But if you do it in church like the teenage boy of this story, then you are a rev­o­lu­tion­ary hero!

SEPTEMBER 13–Some Florida church­go­ers may now think twice about shak­ing their neighbor’s hand fol­low­ing the arrest of a teenager who was allegedly caught mas­tur­bat­ing dur­ing a pair of recent Sun­day services.

Accord­ing to cops, four wit­nesses spot­ted the 14-year-old sus­pect plea­sur­ing him­self inside the sanc­tu­ary of the First United Methodist Church in Niceville.

One mem­ber of the con­gre­ga­tion told police that she observed the teenwith his penis out­side of his pants and stroking it,” a Niceville Police Depart­ment report states.

When ques­tioned by police, the boy copped to expos­ing him­self inside the church on August 28. He explained that he was “play­ing with it” for about 10 min­utes because, “I was bored.”

He also admit­ted mas­tur­bat­ing dur­ing a ser­vice the pre­vi­ous Sun­day. The teenager–whose name cops redacted from the report–was charged with mis­de­meanor inde­cent expo­sure and lewd and las­civ­i­ous behav­ior.

It is unknown whether the alleged per­pe­tra­tor has been allowed back into the sanctuary.

Though, accord­ing to the church’s web site, vis­i­tors should “feel as wel­come as pos­si­ble. That’s why we make it a pri­or­ity to have a ‘come as you are’ atmos­phere on our cam­pus to make you feel at home the minute you arrive.”


Pussy Riot, the original video of the Performance

Do you think meme­ber of Pussy Riot shoud be locked up for 7 years?
Nadezhda Tolokon­nikova, 22, Maria Alekhina, 24, and Yeka­te­rina Samut­se­vich, 29: fem­i­nist activists from the group called Pussy Riot, who face up to seven years in jail if con­victed for stag­ing a peace­ful protest in an Ortho­dox church.
Their trial, which began last week and will con­tinue on Mon­day, has focused world­wide atten­tion on the grow­ing crack­down in Rus­sia since Vladimir Putin returned to the pres­i­dency in May.
A raft of repres­sive laws approved in par­lia­ment, the dubi­ous crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion of a promi­nent oppo­si­tion leader and a series of raids on activists’ homes have, for many Rus­sians, eclipsed the hopes of demo­c­ra­tic progress they indulged dur­ing the one-term pres­i­dency of Dmitry Medvedev, Mr Putin’s pre­de­ces­sor and ally.
Free Pussy Riot! Free Pussy Riot! Free Pussy Riot!